In Western Sahara’s struggle for self-governance both of
these factors still apply. The socio-economic conditions of Western Sahara are similar
and in most cases worse than the majority of North Africa. Being one of the
poorest countries in the world with serious economic issues it is easy to link
this to some of the areas unrest. The rule of Mohammed VI underwent some minor reforms
during the Arab Spring but not nearly and of the drastic changes that were
called for. The very wealthy king is not really shown as an example of authoritarian
government, but his dynasties rule could be classified as such. If the Moroccan
rule of Western Sahara is considered an occupation or as outside control is
would be easy to link the desires of some Western Saharans for self-governance
with that of the protests of the Arab spring.
Personally I see this conflict as a last holdout of colonial
and not really in the context of the modern Arab spring. But Noam Chomsky’s point is very interesting and does make a lot of sense.
Also theres a really good conversation going on > here about this subject
No comments:
Post a Comment